Wappenham Questionnaire Results
Questionnaires were filled-in during the summer of 2003. Please note that this is a draft document. The open questions are not included in the following results, these will come at a later date.
Household
Out of the 120 households in Wappenham who received the questionnaire, 90% (108) responded. The area covered included Astwell Mill – the “back road” between Astwell Mill and Wild Hill (get the list from Hilary so we have a geographical idea of the area we covered).
Please note that the following data and percentages are calculated according to the 108 questionnaires we received, therefore where there are percentages you should bear in mind that that these were calculated by dividing the data by 108 (the number of households that replied to the questionnaire).
At the time that this survey took place, there were 256 individuals living in 108 households. For one household we don’t know how many more individuals live there other than the one who responded to the questionnaire, since the question was left unanswered. There were 197 adults and 59 children in 108 households (again this may be slightly more since for one household we do not have the exact data).
It is interesting to note that in the 1901 census of Wappenham, there were 383 inhabitants living in 103 households (16 households were uninhabited when the census took place). The population had dropped by approximately 33% since then (see table below).

Although the number of households is pretty much the same, it is the size of these, which has reduced.
In 2003, time at which this survey took place, there were 77 (71%) households with no children under 18 living in them and with 2 or less adults, more specifically, 53 households consist of 2 adults and 24 households consist of one adult.
The biggest age groups are the 26 to 40 and the 41 to 55, followed by the 61 to 75 (see table below). We do not know to which age category 6 children and 10 adults belong.
Table of household members per age category

We asked how long each household had been living in Wappenham 36 (33.3%) households had been living in Wappenham between 0-5 years and a further 34 (31.7%) for more than 20 years. Here is the breakdown below.
|
Number of years of residence |
No. Households |
% |
|
0 – 5 years |
36 |
33.3 |
|
6 – 10 years |
14 |
13 |
|
11 – 20 years |
19 |
17.6 |
|
20 – 30 years |
14 |
13 |
|
More than 31 years |
20 |
18.5 |
|
No answer |
5 |
4.6 |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
We asked residents what brought them to Wappenham:
|
Incentive |
No. households |
% |
|
Liked a particular house |
59 |
54.6% |
|
Liked the surrounding countryside |
47 |
43.5% |
|
Central for transport |
5 |
4.6% |
|
My or partners job |
24 |
22.2% |
|
To be nearer to family |
10 |
9.2% |
|
Other |
11 |
10.2% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
We asked residents how important it was for them to live in the countryside:
|
Importance |
No. households |
% |
|
Extremely important |
92 |
85.2% |
|
Fairly important |
11 |
10.2% |
|
Not very important |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Unimportant |
1 |
0.9% |
|
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Here are the principal reasons Wappenham residents chose to live in the countryside?
|
Reason |
No. households |
% |
|
Wildlife |
38 |
35.2% |
|
Outdoor Activity |
30 |
27.8% |
|
Peacefulness |
86 |
80% |
|
Health |
30 |
27.8% |
|
Safety |
23 |
21.3% |
|
Community Life |
22 |
20.4% |
|
Children Wellbeing |
18 |
16.7% |
|
Other |
11 |
10.2% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
Out of the 188 individuals who answered the question 'Do you and your partner have your own means of transportation?' 171 (91%) replied they had their own means of transportation and 17 (9%) replied they did not.
For those who did not have their own means of transportation, below are the modes of transportation they used in lieu:
|
Bus |
Partner or Friends Car |
Taxi |
Adapted bus |
Motorbike |
Bicycle |
Other |
|
3 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
There are 137 individuals who answered the question regarding their status of employment: 40 are self-employed and 97 are employees.
181 individuals answered the question 'Where is your main place of work?'

Twenty-three villagers answered that their main work base was at home, 108 answered that they do not work from home, the remaining did not answer the question.
Amongst those who work from home (this includes people that their home is their work base and those who work from home but where home is not their home base), 13 work full-time form their home base, 10 work 3 days or less and for a further 8 it is variable.
Twenty-four villagers answered that they run a business from Wappenham and 112 indicated that they didn’t. The remaining did not answer the question.
The following question was optional (8 answered) what type of business (es) they ran from Wappenham
Agriculture/Horticulture: 1, Construction: 4, Finance/Prof services: 3, Other service: 5
Below is a table representing the number of employees per businesses in Wappenham (however only 23 said that they ran a business from Wappenham and 26 answered the question, it may be that the further three run a business outside of Wappenham)
|
Number of employees |
None
|
1-3
|
4-5
|
6-10
|
11-25
|
26-99
|
|
Number of businesses |
11 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Out of the 170 respondents who answered the question ‘do you work for a company based in Wappenham?’ 16 answered that they did.
Residents in Wappenham are mainly home owners, below is the breakdown per category :
|
Home owner |
Lodger |
Leaseholder |
Other |
No answer |
|
99 (91.7%) |
0 |
2 (1.8%) |
6 (5.6%) |
1 (0.9%) |
Residents live in the following types of houses:
|
Detached |
Semi-detached |
Terraced |
No answer |
|
71 (65.8%) |
26 (24.1%) |
9 (8.3%) |
2 (1.8%) |
With regards to the questions 'What type(s) of housing development would your household like to see in Wappenham?' respondents could tick as many asnwers as they liked, all of the households (108) that filled in the questionnaire answered this question.
Overall 39.3% of households would not support any housing development in Wappenham paradoxically only 31% said that they would locate new housing ‘nowhere’ (in theory these figures should be the same). If we look at the data in more detail 12 households who have ticked the none category have also ticked another category: 9 ticked single dwellings, two further households have ticked less than 10 and a last household as actually ticked all of the answers even they ‘don’t know’ category! One of the assumptions is that for 11 of these households the residents could not agree on the question and decided to tick as well as ‘none’ another category.
Furthermore, seven households who only ticked the ‘none’ category did not tick ‘nowhere’ to the question where would your household locate new housing in Wappenham. They also ticked infill (4) and conversion of redundant buildings (6).
It seems that the village is divided on this question, especially if we consider that in a single household, individuals do not agree. Because of the high number of households who would not support housing development (38.9%) and that approximately half of the residents 52.3% would support a housing development consisting of single dwellings, further consultation with villagers regarding this question is advisable.
The villagers are also divided regarding affordable housing 43.5% answered they would support such a scheme and 49.1% answered that they wouldn’t the last 7.4% did not answer the question. Again all matters concerning housing requires further consultation.
|
Single dwellings |
57 |
52.3% |
|
Small group(s) of less than 10 |
39 |
36.1% |
|
Larger group(s) |
04 |
3.7% |
|
None |
42 |
38.9% |
|
Don’t Know |
04 |
3.7% |
|
No answer |
02 |
1.8% |
To the question 'Where would your household locate new housing in Wappenham?' 104 households responded the following: (households could tick more than one option)
|
On the edge of the village |
37 |
34.3% |
|
Infill |
44 |
40.7% |
|
Conversion of redundant building(s) |
63 |
58.3% |
|
Nowhere |
31 |
28.7% |
|
Don’t know |
03 |
27.8% |
|
No answer |
02 |
1.8% |
The following question: “would your household support the development of affordable housing? Was answered as follows:
|
Yes |
No |
No answer |
|
47 (43.5%) |
53 (49.1%) |
8 (7.4%) |
Those who answered yes to the previous question and a few who answered no replied that they would situate new affordable housing:
|
Within the present village building line |
Outside of the present village building line |
No answer |
|
36 (33.3%) |
16 (14.8%) |
60 (55.6%) |
To the question ‘How many members of your household attend church services at St-Mary the Virgin in Wappenham?’ Unfortunately we could not compile the answer according to the number of individuals therefore the results are per household
|
Frequency |
No. households |
% |
|
Weekly |
14 |
13% |
|
Monthly |
13 |
12% |
|
Special occasions* |
70 |
64.8% |
|
No answer/Not applicable |
11 |
10.2% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Again to the question 'How many members of your household attend Wappenham and Slapton Independent Evangelical chapel services in Wappenham?' Unfortunately we could not compile the answer according to the number of individuals therefore the results are per household.
|
Frequency |
No. households |
% |
|
Weekly |
3 |
2.8% |
|
Monthly |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Special occasions* |
7 |
6.5% |
|
No answer/Not applicable |
97 |
89.8% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Residents attend other type of religious services in the following places:
|
Syresham |
4 |
|
Weedon Lois |
2 |
|
Wellingborough |
1 |
|
Towcester |
3 |
|
Banbury |
1 |
|
Greens Norton |
1 |
|
Northampton |
2 |
|
Helmdon |
1 |
|
Various venues |
4 |
In the following question 'Even if you do not attend either of the village religious establishments you may still feel strongly about the church and chapel buildings, their security, their history, the cemetery, the church clock, the bells, the positioning of phone masts, etc.' residents were asked to darken a thermometer from 0 to 100 degrees, 0 being very cold and 100 being very hot, to represent how strongly they felt about the chapel and the church, here a re the results:
|
Opinion/Chapel |
No. household |
% |
| Very Hot |
17 |
15.7% |
| Warm |
33 |
30.6% |
|
Very Cold |
23 |
21.3% |
| No answer |
35 |
32.4% |
| Total |
108 |
100% |
|
Opinion/Church |
No. household |
% |
|
Very Hot |
63 |
58.3% |
|
Warm |
30 |
27.8% |
|
Very Cold |
6 |
5.6% |
|
No answer |
9 |
8.3% |
| Total |
108 |
100% |
With regards to Wappenham chapel, residents think that villagers as a whole are consulted:
|
Opinion/Chapel |
No. household |
% |
|
Effectively |
4 |
3.7% |
|
Reasonably |
16 |
14.8% |
|
Not sufficiently |
10 |
9.3% |
|
Not at all |
25 |
23.1% |
|
Don’t know |
1 |
0.9% |
|
No answer |
52 |
48.2% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
With regards to Wappenham church, residents think that villagers as a whole are consulted:
|
Opinion/Church |
No. household |
% |
|
Effectively |
11 |
10.2% |
|
Reasonably |
41 |
38% |
|
Not sufficiently |
13 |
12% |
|
Not at all |
15 |
13.9% |
|
Don’t know |
21 |
19.4% |
|
No answer |
7 |
6.5% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Twenty-eight households consider that changes in the church or the chapel are purely the concern of registered Church or Chapel members and 63 consider that it is the concern of all residents. Eleven households answered that they did not know and 6 further households did not answer the question. Eighty-one households consider that Wappenham church and chapel are part of the wider heritage/history of the village and 6 households consider that they are not, 13 don't know and 8 households did not answer the question
Questions regarding recycling were answered by most households and most of them would be prepared to sort their rubbish for recycling. Here is the breakdown
|
Would you be prepared to sort your rubbish for recycling |
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
99 |
91.7% |
|
No |
6 |
5.6% |
|
Don't know |
0 |
0% |
|
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
However, a minority would be prepared to pay additional council tax in order to have recycling collected from the village or from their home:
|
Additional Tax |
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
37 |
34.3% |
|
No |
69 |
63.9% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Instead, a majority of households are prepared to have refuse and recycling picked-up on alternate weeks in order not to pay extra council taxes for recycling:
|
Alternate weeks |
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
75 |
69.4% |
|
No |
31 |
28.7% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Most households would prefer private bins:
|
Bin type |
No. household |
% |
|
Private Bins |
83 |
76.9% |
|
Communal bins |
27 |
25% |
|
No answer |
4 |
3.7% |
|
Total |
113 |
|
Although only 27 said they would prefer communal bins, forty-eight households answered the question 'if communal bins are the preferred option, should they be in':
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
In Wappenham |
30 |
27.8% |
|
Outside Wappenham |
18 |
16.7% |
|
No answer |
60 |
55.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Residents responded to the question 'Does your household consider littering to be a problem in Wappenham' the following:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
20 |
18.5% |
|
No |
86 |
79.6% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Residents responded to the question 'Does your household find animal excrements do be a problem in Wappenham' the following:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
37 |
34.3% |
|
No |
69 |
63.9% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Residents were divided with regards to having guidelines to prevent light pollution from roof lights, garden and security lights, and so on:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
47 |
43.5% |
|
No |
56 |
51.9% |
|
No answer |
5 |
4.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Ninety-two households believe that Wappenham does not suffer from noise pollution and 14 believe it does, 2 households did not answer the question. With regards to air pollution, 94 said that Wappenham did not suffer from air pollution and 11 believe it does, 3 households diod not answer the question.
To the question 'Do members of your household think these local roads passing through the village are' residents replied that they thought they were:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Well maintained |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Adequately maintained |
33 |
30.6% |
|
Poorly maintained |
53 |
49.1% |
|
Abominable |
20 |
18.5% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Residents use Wappenham roads and pathways as:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Motorists |
101 |
93.5% |
|
Cyclists |
48 |
44.4% |
|
Pedestrians |
81 |
75.0% |
|
Horse Riders |
15 |
13.9% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
Fifty-eight households consider that there is potential accident black spots (E.g. Syresham Road - High Street junction, Weedon Road - High Street Junction, exits from Pittam’s Lane and School Lane, etc.) in the village that could be improved with a little thought? Households suggestions will be posted later on, on this page.
To the question 'Would your household like to see calming measures introduced? (E.g. Speed bumps, signs, pelican crossing, other, etc.)' residents replied the following:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
47 |
43.5% |
|
No |
57 |
52.8% |
|
No answer |
4 |
3.7% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
To the question Would your household like courtesy signs to be introduced into the village?' residents replied the following:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
37 |
34.3% |
|
No |
54 |
50.0% |
|
No answer |
17 |
15.7% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Does your household think that:
|
Options |
No. household |
% |
|
The 30 mile per hour signs being moved at least a further 100 metres from the present village edges would allow motorists to slow down |
29 |
26.9% |
|
The introduction of 40 mile per hour signs 200 metres from the present 30 mile per hour signs would be more effective |
26 |
24.1% |
|
None of the above |
47 |
43.5% |
|
No answer |
6 |
5.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Is adequate provision made for car parking in the village?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
40 |
37.0% |
|
No |
57 |
52.8% |
|
No answer |
11 |
10.2% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Is parking on pavements, causing pedestrians (young children, elderly, etc.) to walk into the road, a problem in Wappenham?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
29 |
26.9% |
|
No |
71 |
65.7% |
|
No answer |
8 |
7.4% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Do members of your household use the footpaths and bridleways around Wappenham?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Often |
64 |
59.3% |
|
Occasionally |
36 |
33.3% |
|
Rarely |
5 |
4.6% |
|
Never |
2 |
1.9% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Does your household find that the field footpaths & bridleways around Wappenham are maintained properly?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
78 |
72.2% |
|
No |
17 |
15.7% |
|
Don't know |
11 |
10.2% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Would a map of the surrounding field footpaths and bridleways be helpful to members of your household?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
77 |
71.3% |
|
No |
30 |
27.8% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Would it be practical to develop existing footpaths/bridleways/ former railway tracks, to a cycle route between Wappenham and Towcester or Brackley?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
72 |
66.7% |
|
No |
36 |
33.3% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Does your household think Wappenham needs streetlights?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
18 |
16.7% |
|
No |
89 |
82.4% |
|
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Would you be prepared to pay additional council taxes in order to have streetlights?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
13 |
12.0% |
|
No |
93 |
86.1% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Does your household use the Playground area?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
34 |
31.5% |
|
No |
71 |
65.7% |
|
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Out of the 71 households who answered 'No' to the previous question, 66 said why they did not use it:
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Do not want to |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Equipment not suitable for age of children |
5 |
4.6% |
|
No children in household |
60 |
55.6% |
|
No answer |
6 |
5.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Would members of your household like Wappenham to have more public green areas?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
27 |
25.0% |
|
No |
71 |
65.7% |
|
No answer |
10 |
9.3% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
The question ‘Which of the following improvements would your household like to see made as a priority to the village hall?’ households needed to rank each item form 1 to 7, here is how villagers would prioritise work on the villager hall:
|
Priority 1 |
Improved toilets & disabled toilets |
|
Priority 2 |
Redecorating the interior |
|
Priority 3 |
Improved Heating |
|
Priority 4 |
Improved Kitchen |
|
Priority 5 |
Refurbishing the entrance |
|
Priority 6 |
Improved Interior Lighting |
|
Priority 7 |
Other |
To the question: ‘Would your household support the development of an extension to the south of the village hall?’ Most households responded that they would, however, because of the high number of households ticking the box ‘don’t know’ this would suggest that there is a need to inform villagers with regards to what this entails. Perhaps a description of this in the next newsletter and on the website with a sketch of the proposed extension?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
59 |
54.6% |
|
No |
16 |
14.8% |
|
Don’t know |
28 |
25.9% |
|
No answer |
5 |
4.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
To the question ‘Would members of your household like the village hall to be no smoking?’ Again a majority of households responded ‘Yes’. Households who responded ‘don’t know' to this question is possibly because they do not mind either way.
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
60 |
55.6% |
|
No |
24 |
22.2% |
|
Don’t know |
19 |
17.6% |
|
No answer |
5 |
4.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
With regards to an alcohol license a good majority of households responded that they would like the village hall to have an alcohol license.
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
69 |
63.9% |
|
No |
13 |
12.0% |
|
Don’t know |
20 |
18.5% |
|
No answer |
6 |
5.6% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
How important would you say the village shop is to your household?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Extremely important |
70 |
64.8% |
|
Fairly important |
25 |
23.1% |
|
Not very important |
13 |
12.0% |
|
Unimportant |
0 |
0.0% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
How important would you say the Post Office is to your household?
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Extremely important |
71 |
65.7% |
|
Fairly important |
27 |
25.0% |
|
Not very important |
10 |
9.3% |
|
Unimportant |
0 |
0.0% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
On average, how often does your household use the village shop?
|
Frequency |
No. household |
% |
|
More than once a week |
63 |
58.3% |
|
Weekly |
27 |
25.0% |
|
Monthly |
10 |
9.3% |
|
Rarely |
7 |
6.5% |
|
Never |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
For what purpose does your household use the village shop: (Tick as many as you like)
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Post Office |
103 |
95.4% |
|
Groceries |
92 |
85.2% |
|
Local events/tickets |
63 |
58.3% |
|
Social Contact |
41 |
38.0% |
|
Off licence |
39 |
36.1% |
|
Other (please specify) |
16 |
14.8% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
On average, how much money does your household spend on groceries per month? (It seems that some villagers may have interpreted the question as being 'how much money do you spend on groceries per month in general' but not specifically at the village shop. Therefore the figures below should be viewed with caution.)
|
£ spent |
No. household |
% |
|
00.00 to 09.99 |
6 |
5.6% |
|
10.00 to 19.99 |
2 |
1.9% |
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
12 |
11.1% |
|
30.00 to 49.99 |
11 |
10.2% |
|
50.00 to 74.99 |
57 |
52.8% |
|
Over 75.00 |
16 |
14.8% |
|
No answer |
4 |
3.7% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
How much money does your household spend at the village post office per month?
|
£ spent |
No. household |
% |
|
00.00 to 09.99 |
40 |
37.0% |
|
10.00 to 19.99 |
19 |
17.6% |
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
18 |
16.7% |
|
30.00 to 49.99 |
7 |
6.5% |
|
50.00 to 74.99 |
4 |
3.7% |
|
Over 75.00 |
7 |
6.5% |
|
No answer |
13 |
12.0% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
How much money does your business(es) spend at the village post office per month?
|
£ spent |
No. household |
% |
|
00.00 to 09.99 |
11 |
10.2% |
|
10.00 to 19.99 |
7 |
6.5% |
|
20.00 to 29.99 |
7 |
6.5% |
|
30.00 to 49.99 |
1 |
0.9% |
|
50.00 to 74.99 |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Over 75.00 |
1 |
0.9% |
|
Not applicable |
39 |
36.1% |
|
No answer |
41 |
38.0% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Do members of your household use the bus services from Wappenham? (Northampton, Brackley, Banbury, school bus, etc.)
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
17 |
15.7% |
|
No |
89 |
82.4% |
|
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
Out of the 17 households who answered the above question, 16 indicated why they used the bus or to where they went. Few answered both why and where.
|
Meet Friends |
1 |
|
Appointments |
2 |
|
Shopping |
5 |
|
School |
4 |
|
Northampton |
10 |
|
Towcester |
4 |
|
Brackley |
3 |
|
Banbury |
1 |
|
Blisworth |
1 |
Twenty-two households (20.6%) said that they would use the bus to go to MK once a month. One household answered possibly. VAP committee should investigate the possibility further would the bus services and see what is the number of people they need to set up the service.
|
|
No. household |
% |
|
Yes |
23 |
21.3% |
|
No |
81 |
75.0% |
|
Possibly |
1 |
0.9% |
|
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
|
Total |
108 |
100% |
If members of your household had the possibility to use public transport from the village to get to work, would they use it?
|
|